科技评论

“Vibe Coding”是泡沫吗?为何AI应用构建器是下一个GoPro

Published on October 14, 2025

#Vibe Coding#AI#No-Code#Lovable#GoPro#Startup#市场分析#商业模式#用户流失#风险投资

The 'Vibe Coding' Market: A Critical Analysis

The GoPro Analogy: Selling an Aspiration, Not a Product

The core argument is that AI app builders for non-developers (like Lovable, Replet) function like GoPro cameras. They sell an exciting aspiration—the dream that anyone can become a developer or an action videographer. However, after the initial novelty wears off, most users abandon the product because they don't have a persistent problem to solve, leading to a massive drop in engagement, much like GoPro's stock price collapse.

Novelty vs. Utility: The Driver of the Boom and Bust

User adoption is driven by two factors: utility (solving a real problem) and novelty (the excitement of trying something new). The initial surge in traffic for these platforms was fueled by novelty. As this novelty fades, the lack of a strong, continuous use case for the average non-developer user leads to high churn rates.

The 'Graduation Problem': Why Everyone Leaves

These tools face a fundamental churn issue. The vast majority of users (99%) will quit when they realize building a real app is complex and difficult. The small fraction (1%) who succeed and learn to code will 'graduate' to professional tools like VS Code and Cursor. In either scenario, the user leaves the platform.

An Important Correction: Traffic vs. Revenue

While initial data suggested a massive traffic drop for companies like Lovable, internal investor data indicates that revenue and the number of paying customers are actually growing. The public traffic decline might be linked to changes in ad spend targeting casual users, while the core business of serving more committed users remains healthy. This doesn't invalidate the GoPro analogy for the mass market, but adds crucial nuance.

The Silver Lining: A Gateway for New Developers

Despite potential business model flaws, these platforms serve a valuable societal role. Just as GoPro was a gateway into videography for many, these tools significantly lower the barrier to entry for coding. They might inspire the next generation of software developers, even if the companies themselves don't achieve massive, long-term commercial success. They are using venture capital to subsidize the first coding lesson for millions.

View Chinese Translation

“Vibe Coding”是泡沫吗?为何AI应用构建器是下一个GoPro

本文深入探讨了当前流行的“Vibe Coding”(或称AI应用构建器)市场的潜在风险,其核心观点是,这类产品的商业模式与曾经风靡一时的GoPro相机高度相似。

核心类比:GoPro——销售愿景,而非产品

AI应用构建器(如Lovable、Replet)的目标用户是非开发者。它们卖的不是一个工具,而是一个**“人人都能成为开发者”的梦想**,就像GoPro卖的是“人人都能成为极限运动摄影师”的愿景一样。然而,当最初的**新奇感(Novelty)**消退后,大多数用户因为没有持续的使用需求而放弃产品,导致用户粘性极低,这与GoPro股价暴跌的历程如出一辙。

致命缺陷:“毕业问题”

这类工具面临一个根本性的“毕业问题”,导致用户必然流失:

  1. **绝大多数用户(99%)**在尝试后发现,构建一个真正有用的App远比想象中复杂,最终因困难、昂贵或失去兴趣而放弃。
  2. 极少数成功入门的用户(1%),会迅速“毕业”到更专业的开发工具(如VS Code),同样会离开平台。

重要修正:流量不等于收入

尽管公开数据显示某些平台的网站流量大幅下降,但演讲者作为投资者指出,核心的付费用户和收入仍在增长。这表明,虽然由“新奇感”驱动的大众流量正在消退,但服务于更认真用户的核心业务可能依然健康。这并未完全推翻GoPro类比,但为其增添了重要的复杂性。

社会价值:“银色衬里”

尽管商业模式存在风险,但这些平台具有重要的社会价值。它们极大地降低了编程的入门门槛,就像GoPro是许多人视频制作的启蒙工具一样。即使99%的用户会离开,它们也可能为那1%的用户开启了通往软件开发世界的大门,用VC的钱为下一代开发者上了第一堂课。

Source: 科技趋势分析